feat: 功能优化

This commit is contained in:
2025-12-15 23:33:02 +08:00
parent 7f7551f74f
commit 870ea10351
36 changed files with 3289 additions and 40 deletions

456
openspec/AGENTS.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
# OpenSpec Instructions
Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development.
## TL;DR Quick Checklist
- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list` (use `rg` only for full-text search)
- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability
- Pick a unique `change-id`: kebab-case, verb-led (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`)
- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability
- Write deltas: use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements`; include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement
- Validate: `openspec validate [change-id] --strict` and fix issues
- Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved
## Three-Stage Workflow
### Stage 1: Creating Changes
Create proposal when you need to:
- Add features or functionality
- Make breaking changes (API, schema)
- Change architecture or patterns
- Optimize performance (changes behavior)
- Update security patterns
Triggers (examples):
- "Help me create a change proposal"
- "Help me plan a change"
- "Help me create a proposal"
- "I want to create a spec proposal"
- "I want to create a spec"
Loose matching guidance:
- Contains one of: `proposal`, `change`, `spec`
- With one of: `create`, `plan`, `make`, `start`, `help`
Skip proposal for:
- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior)
- Typos, formatting, comments
- Dependency updates (non-breaking)
- Configuration changes
- Tests for existing behavior
**Workflow**
1. Review `openspec/project.md`, `openspec list`, and `openspec list --specs` to understand current context.
2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and spec deltas under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.
3. Draft spec deltas using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement.
4. Run `openspec validate <id> --strict` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal.
### Stage 2: Implementing Changes
Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.
1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built
2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions
3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist
4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order
5. **Confirm completion** - Ensure every item in `tasks.md` is finished before updating statuses
6. **Update checklist** - After all work is done, set every task to `- [x]` so the list reflects reality
7. **Approval gate** - Do not start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved
### Stage 3: Archiving Changes
After deployment, create separate PR to:
- Move `changes/[name]/``changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/`
- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed
- Use `openspec archive <change-id> --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes (always pass the change ID explicitly)
- Run `openspec validate --strict` to confirm the archived change passes checks
## Before Any Task
**Context Checklist:**
- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts
- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions
- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes
- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities
**Before Creating Specs:**
- Always check if capability already exists
- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates
- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state
- If request is ambiguous, ask 12 clarifying questions before scaffolding
### Search Guidance
- Enumerate specs: `openspec spec list --long` (or `--json` for scripts)
- Enumerate changes: `openspec list` (or `openspec change list --json` - deprecated but available)
- Show details:
- Spec: `openspec show <spec-id> --type spec` (use `--json` for filters)
- Change: `openspec show <change-id> --json --deltas-only`
- Full-text search (use ripgrep): `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs`
## Quick Start
### CLI Commands
```bash
# Essential commands
openspec list # List active changes
openspec list --specs # List specifications
openspec show [item] # Display change or spec
openspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs
openspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Archive after deployment (add --yes for non-interactive runs)
# Project management
openspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec
openspec update [path] # Update instruction files
# Interactive mode
openspec show # Prompts for selection
openspec validate # Bulk validation mode
# Debugging
openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only
openspec validate [change] --strict
```
### Command Flags
- `--json` - Machine-readable output
- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items
- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation
- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts
- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates
- `--yes`/`-y` - Skip confirmation prompts (non-interactive archive)
## Directory Structure
```
openspec/
├── project.md # Project conventions
├── specs/ # Current truth - what IS built
│ └── [capability]/ # Single focused capability
│ ├── spec.md # Requirements and scenarios
│ └── design.md # Technical patterns
├── changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change
│ ├── [change-name]/
│ │ ├── proposal.md # Why, what, impact
│ │ ├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist
│ │ ├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional; see criteria)
│ │ └── specs/ # Delta changes
│ │ └── [capability]/
│ │ └── spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED
│ └── archive/ # Completed changes
```
## Creating Change Proposals
### Decision Tree
```
New request?
├─ Bug fix restoring spec behavior? → Fix directly
├─ Typo/format/comment? → Fix directly
├─ New feature/capability? → Create proposal
├─ Breaking change? → Create proposal
├─ Architecture change? → Create proposal
└─ Unclear? → Create proposal (safer)
```
### Proposal Structure
1. **Create directory:** `changes/[change-id]/` (kebab-case, verb-led, unique)
2. **Write proposal.md:**
```markdown
# Change: [Brief description of change]
## Why
[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity]
## What Changes
- [Bullet list of changes]
- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**]
## Impact
- Affected specs: [list capabilities]
- Affected code: [key files/systems]
```
3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md`
```markdown
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: New Feature
The system SHALL provide...
#### Scenario: Success case
- **WHEN** user performs action
- **THEN** expected result
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Existing Feature
[Complete modified requirement]
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Old Feature
**Reason**: [Why removing]
**Migration**: [How to handle]
```
If multiple capabilities are affected, create multiple delta files under `changes/[change-id]/specs/<capability>/spec.md`—one per capability.
4. **Create tasks.md:**
```markdown
## 1. Implementation
- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema
- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint
- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component
- [ ] 1.4 Write tests
```
5. **Create design.md when needed:**
Create `design.md` if any of the following apply; otherwise omit it:
- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or a new architectural pattern
- New external dependency or significant data model changes
- Security, performance, or migration complexity
- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding
Minimal `design.md` skeleton:
```markdown
## Context
[Background, constraints, stakeholders]
## Goals / Non-Goals
- Goals: [...]
- Non-Goals: [...]
## Decisions
- Decision: [What and why]
- Alternatives considered: [Options + rationale]
## Risks / Trade-offs
- [Risk] → Mitigation
## Migration Plan
[Steps, rollback]
## Open Questions
- [...]
```
## Spec File Format
### Critical: Scenario Formatting
**CORRECT** (use #### headers):
```markdown
#### Scenario: User login success
- **WHEN** valid credentials provided
- **THEN** return JWT token
```
**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold):
```markdown
- **Scenario: User login** ❌
**Scenario**: User login ❌
### Scenario: User login ❌
```
Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario.
### Requirement Wording
- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative)
### Delta Operations
- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities
- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior
- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features
- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes
Headers matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored.
#### When to use ADDED vs MODIFIED
- ADDED: Introduces a new capability or sub-capability that can stand alone as a requirement. Prefer ADDED when the change is orthogonal (e.g., adding "Slash Command Configuration") rather than altering the semantics of an existing requirement.
- MODIFIED: Changes the behavior, scope, or acceptance criteria of an existing requirement. Always paste the full, updated requirement content (header + all scenarios). The archiver will replace the entire requirement with what you provide here; partial deltas will drop previous details.
- RENAMED: Use when only the name changes. If you also change behavior, use RENAMED (name) plus MODIFIED (content) referencing the new name.
Common pitfall: Using MODIFIED to add a new concern without including the previous text. This causes loss of detail at archive time. If you arent explicitly changing the existing requirement, add a new requirement under ADDED instead.
Authoring a MODIFIED requirement correctly:
1) Locate the existing requirement in `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`.
2) Copy the entire requirement block (from `### Requirement: ...` through its scenarios).
3) Paste it under `## MODIFIED Requirements` and edit to reflect the new behavior.
4) Ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive) and keep at least one `#### Scenario:`.
Example for RENAMED:
```markdown
## RENAMED Requirements
- FROM: `### Requirement: Login`
- TO: `### Requirement: User Authentication`
```
## Troubleshooting
### Common Errors
**"Change must have at least one delta"**
- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files
- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements)
**"Requirement must have at least one scenario"**
- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)
- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers
**Silent scenario parsing failures**
- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name`
- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only`
### Validation Tips
```bash
# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks
openspec validate [change] --strict
# Debug delta parsing
openspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas'
# Check specific requirement
openspec show [spec] --json -r 1
```
## Happy Path Script
```bash
# 1) Explore current state
openspec spec list --long
openspec list
# Optional full-text search:
# rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs
# rg -n "^#|Requirement:" openspec/changes
# 2) Choose change id and scaffold
CHANGE=add-two-factor-auth
mkdir -p openspec/changes/$CHANGE/{specs/auth}
printf "## Why\n...\n\n## What Changes\n- ...\n\n## Impact\n- ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/proposal.md
printf "## 1. Implementation\n- [ ] 1.1 ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/tasks.md
# 3) Add deltas (example)
cat > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/specs/auth/spec.md << 'EOF'
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
Users MUST provide a second factor during login.
#### Scenario: OTP required
- **WHEN** valid credentials are provided
- **THEN** an OTP challenge is required
EOF
# 4) Validate
openspec validate $CHANGE --strict
```
## Multi-Capability Example
```
openspec/changes/add-2fa-notify/
├── proposal.md
├── tasks.md
└── specs/
├── auth/
│ └── spec.md # ADDED: Two-Factor Authentication
└── notifications/
└── spec.md # ADDED: OTP email notification
```
auth/spec.md
```markdown
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication
...
```
notifications/spec.md
```markdown
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: OTP Email Notification
...
```
## Best Practices
### Simplicity First
- Default to <100 lines of new code
- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient
- Avoid frameworks without clear justification
- Choose boring, proven patterns
### Complexity Triggers
Only add complexity with:
- Performance data showing current solution too slow
- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data)
- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction
### Clear References
- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations
- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md`
- Link related changes and PRs
### Capability Naming
- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture`
- Single purpose per capability
- 10-minute understandability rule
- Split if description needs "AND"
### Change ID Naming
- Use kebab-case, short and descriptive: `add-two-factor-auth`
- Prefer verb-led prefixes: `add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`
- Ensure uniqueness; if taken, append `-2`, `-3`, etc.
## Tool Selection Guide
| Task | Tool | Why |
|------|------|-----|
| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching |
| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search |
| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access |
| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation |
## Error Recovery
### Change Conflicts
1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes
2. Check for overlapping specs
3. Coordinate with change owners
4. Consider combining proposals
### Validation Failures
1. Run with `--strict` flag
2. Check JSON output for details
3. Verify spec file format
4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted
### Missing Context
1. Read project.md first
2. Check related specs
3. Review recent archives
4. Ask for clarification
## Quick Reference
### Stage Indicators
- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built
- `specs/` - Built and deployed
- `archive/` - Completed changes
### File Purposes
- `proposal.md` - Why and what
- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps
- `design.md` - Technical decisions
- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior
### CLI Essentials
```bash
openspec list # What's in progress?
openspec show [item] # View details
openspec validate --strict # Is it correct?
openspec archive <change-id> [--yes|-y] # Mark complete (add --yes for automation)
```
Remember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
## Context
混剪功能需要将多种比例的素材统一输出为 9:16 竖屏视频720x1280
阿里云 ICE 支持视频裁剪和缩放,需要在 Timeline 中配置正确的参数。
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- 支持横屏 (16:9) 素材自动裁剪为竖屏 (9:16)
- 支持多种裁剪模式(居中、智能、填充)
- 保持视频质量,避免过度拉伸
**Non-Goals:**
- 不实现自定义裁剪区域选择
- 不实现实时预览
## Decisions
### 裁剪模式设计
| 模式 | 说明 | 适用场景 |
|------|------|----------|
| `center` | 居中裁剪,保持原始比例 | 主体在画面中央 |
| `smart` | 智能裁剪ICE AI 识别主体) | 人物/产品展示 |
| `fill` | 填充黑边,不裁剪 | 保留完整画面 |
### ICE 参数方案
**方案 A使用 CropX/CropY/CropW/CropH**
```json
{
"MediaURL": "xxx",
"CropX": 280,
"CropY": 0,
"CropW": 720,
"CropH": 1280
}
```
**方案 B使用 Effects + Crop**
```json
{
"Effects": [{
"Type": "Crop",
"X": 280,
"Y": 0,
"Width": 720,
"Height": 1280
}]
}
```
### 裁剪计算公式
对于 16:9 横屏素材 (1920x1080) 裁剪为 9:16
```
目标比例 = 9/16 = 0.5625
源比例 = 16/9 = 1.778
// 居中裁剪
cropHeight = sourceHeight = 1080
cropWidth = cropHeight * (9/16) = 607.5 ≈ 608
cropX = (sourceWidth - cropWidth) / 2 = (1920 - 608) / 2 = 656
cropY = 0
```
## Risks / Trade-offs
- **画面损失**:居中裁剪会丢失左右两侧内容
- **缩放失真**:填充模式会缩小画面
- **ICE 兼容性**:需确认 ICE 版本支持的参数
## Open Questions
1. ICE 是否支持智能主体识别裁剪?
2. 是否需要前端预览裁剪效果?
3. 默认裁剪模式选择哪种?

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# Change: ICE 增加 9:16 竖屏裁剪支持
## Why
当前混剪功能输出固定为 720x1280 (9:16) 尺寸,但输入素材可能是横屏 (16:9) 或其他比例。
需要支持自动裁剪/缩放,确保输出视频符合竖屏要求,避免黑边或变形。
## What Changes
- 新增视频裁剪模式配置(居中裁剪 / 智能裁剪 / 填充黑边)
- ICE Timeline 增加 CropMode 参数
- 后端支持不同比例素材的自动处理
- 前端可选裁剪模式(默认居中裁剪)
## Impact
- Affected specs: `mix-task`
- Affected code:
- `BatchProduceAlignment.java` - Timeline 构建逻辑
- `MixTaskSaveReqVO.java` - 新增 cropMode 参数
- `Mix.vue` - 可选裁剪模式

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: 9:16 竖屏裁剪支持
混剪系统 SHALL 支持将不同比例的素材自动处理为 9:16 竖屏输出。
系统 SHALL 提供以下裁剪模式:
- `center`:居中裁剪,保持原始比例,裁剪超出部分
- `smart`:智能裁剪,识别主体位置进行裁剪(依赖 ICE 能力)
- `fill`:填充模式,缩放素材并填充黑边保留完整画面
系统 SHALL 默认使用 `center` 居中裁剪模式。
#### Scenario: 横屏素材居中裁剪
- **WHEN** 用户上传 16:9 横屏素材1920x1080
- **AND** 选择 `center` 裁剪模式
- **THEN** 系统自动计算裁剪区域(居中取 608x1080
- **AND** 输出 720x1280 竖屏视频
#### Scenario: 竖屏素材无需裁剪
- **WHEN** 用户上传 9:16 竖屏素材720x1280
- **THEN** 系统直接使用原素材
- **AND** 不进行裁剪处理
#### Scenario: 填充模式保留完整画面
- **WHEN** 用户上传 16:9 横屏素材
- **AND** 选择 `fill` 填充模式
- **THEN** 系统缩放素材至竖屏宽度
- **AND** 上下填充黑边
- **AND** 输出 720x1280 竖屏视频
### Requirement: 裁剪模式配置
混剪任务创建 API SHALL 接受可选的 `cropMode` 参数。
参数规格:
- 字段名:`cropMode`
- 类型String
- 可选值:`center` | `smart` | `fill`
- 默认值:`center`
#### Scenario: 指定裁剪模式
- **WHEN** 用户创建混剪任务时指定 `cropMode: "fill"`
- **THEN** 所有素材使用填充模式处理
#### Scenario: 使用默认裁剪模式
- **WHEN** 用户创建混剪任务未指定 `cropMode`
- **THEN** 系统使用默认的 `center` 居中裁剪模式

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
## 1. 调研阶段
- [ ] 1.1 确认阿里云 ICE 支持的裁剪参数CropX/CropY/CropW/CropH 或 ScaleMode
- [ ] 1.2 测试横屏素材在 ICE 中的默认处理方式
## 2. 后端实现
- [ ] 2.1 MixTaskSaveReqVO 新增 cropMode 字段center/smart/fill
- [ ] 2.2 BatchProduceAlignment 实现裁剪计算逻辑
- [ ] 2.3 ICE Timeline 增加裁剪参数
- [ ] 2.4 单元测试
## 3. 前端实现
- [ ] 3.1 Mix.vue 新增裁剪模式选择(默认居中裁剪)
- [ ] 3.2 提交参数增加 cropMode
## 4. 测试验证
- [ ] 4.1 横屏素材混剪测试
- [ ] 4.2 竖屏素材混剪测试
- [ ] 4.3 混合比例素材测试

1026
openspec/mix-logic-spec.md Normal file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# 混剪功能规格(简化版)
## 核心需求
- **输入**:用户选择素材 + 设定每个素材截取时长3-15s
- **输出**1-3个不同内容的混剪视频
- **总时长**15s-60s
- **差异化**:同顺序 + 同时长 + **随机截取起点**
## 多视频差异化算法
### 核心原理
**随机起点 + 容错机制**
- 每个视频使用**随机截取起点**,确保内容完全不同
- 支持**不同长度的素材**ICE自动容错处理
- 容错如果起点超出素材长度ICE自动从0开始截取
**随机种子**:使用 `素材ID×1000000 + 视频序号×10000 + URL哈希%1000` 确保可重现性
### 算法实现
**随机起点生成**
```java
// 1. 先获取视频实际时长
int actualDuration = getVideoDuration(videoUrl);
// 2. 生成随机种子
long randomSeed = (material.getFileId() * 1000000L) +
(videoIndex * 10000L) +
(material.getFileUrl().hashCode() % 1000);
Random random = new Random(randomSeed);
// 3. 根据实际时长计算起始范围
int maxStartOffset = Math.max(0, actualDuration - duration);
int startOffset = random.nextInt(maxStartOffset + 1);
int endOffset = startOffset + duration;
```
**获取视频时长方案**
1. **数据库字段**上传时预存duration字段推荐
2. **FFprobe工具**:命令行获取视频元数据
3. **ICE元数据API**调用ICE查询接口
4. **默认60秒**:保守值,兼容性最好
**容错机制**
- 根据实际时长计算最大起始偏移,避免超出素材长度
- 如果获取时长失败使用默认值60秒
- ICE自动处理边界情况
### ICE Timeline构建
每个素材片段包含参数:
- `MediaURL`:素材地址
- `In`随机截取起始点0到实际时长-duration之间
- `Out`:截取结束点 = `In + duration`
- `TimelineIn/TimelineOut`:时间轴位置(顺序拼接)
ICE自动处理超出素材长度的情况无需额外判断。
## API设计
### 请求格式
```http
POST /api/mix/create
{
"title": "",
"materials": [
{ "fileId": 123, "fileUrl": "https://xxx/v1.mp4", "duration": 5 },
{ "fileId": 456, "fileUrl": "https://xxx/v2.mp4", "duration": 8 },
{ "fileId": 789, "fileUrl": "https://xxx/v3.mp4", "duration": 5 }
],
"produceCount": 3
}
```
### 后端处理流程
1. 校验请求参数总时长15-60s
2. 循环生成produceCount个视频
- videoIndex = 0, 1, 2...
- 获取每个素材的实际时长(数据库/FFprobe/ICE API
- 生成随机起点基于素材ID×1000000 + videoIndex×10000 + URL哈希
- 根据实际时长计算起始范围,避免超出素材长度
- 构建Timeline传递随机In/Out参数给ICE
- 提交ICE任务
3. 保存任务并返回任务ID
## 校验规则
| 规则 | 前端 | 后端 |
|------|------|------|
| 总时长 15-60s | ✅ | ✅ |
| 单素材 3-15s | ✅ | ✅ |
| 至少选1个素材 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 生成数量 1-3 | ✅ | ✅ |
## 实现清单
### 已完成
- [x] 前端时长选择和实时计算
- [x] 后端VOMaterialItem实现
- [x] 后端DOmaterialsJson字段
- [x] 数据库迁移脚本
- [x] 后端Controller/api/mix/create
- [x] 后端Service多视频生成逻辑
- [x] ICE Timeline构建随机起点+实际时长+容错)
- [x] 批量任务提交和状态跟踪
### 测试验证
- [ ] 编译验证
- [ ] 端到端功能测试
- [ ] 多视频差异化验证
---
## 代码修改清单
### 核心修改
1. **BatchProduceAlignment.java**
- 新增方法:`produceSingleVideoWithOffset(materials, videoIndex, userId)`
- 新增方法:`getVideoDuration(videoUrl)` - 获取视频实际时长
- 核心逻辑:先获取实际时长,再生成随机起点
- 容错机制:根据实际时长计算范围,避免超出长度
2. **MixTaskServiceImpl.java**
- 循环生成produceCount个视频
- 每次传入不同的videoIndex确保随机起点不同
3. **数据库结构(可选改进)**
- 新增字段:`duration INTEGER COMMENT '视频时长(秒)'`
- 上传时预处理使用FFprobe获取时长并存储
*版本v3.0 - 简化版ICE自动容错*

31
openspec/project.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Project Context
## Purpose
[Describe your project's purpose and goals]
## Tech Stack
- [List your primary technologies]
- [e.g., TypeScript, React, Node.js]
## Project Conventions
### Code Style
[Describe your code style preferences, formatting rules, and naming conventions]
### Architecture Patterns
[Document your architectural decisions and patterns]
### Testing Strategy
[Explain your testing approach and requirements]
### Git Workflow
[Describe your branching strategy and commit conventions]
## Domain Context
[Add domain-specific knowledge that AI assistants need to understand]
## Important Constraints
[List any technical, business, or regulatory constraints]
## External Dependencies
[Document key external services, APIs, or systems]